Springhill Place · Strata Plan LMS1203 · 140 E. 14th Street, North Vancouver

The $900,000 elevator levy ($1M project) — what to know before September 21

A plain-language look at the proposed $1,000,000 elevator project — $900,000 as a special levy plus up to $100,000 from the contingency reserve fund — what BC law says about your rights as an owner, realistic cost scenarios, and a ready-to-send email so you can get real answers before you vote. Our position: no documents, no $1M — vote NO until it's documented.

Meeting
Special General Meeting
Date
Monday, Sept 21, 2026
Where
Main floor meeting room, 140 E. 14th St
Vote needed
3/4 of votes cast (abstentions excluded)

What's happening

Owners are being asked to approve a $1,000,000 elevator modernization project for both elevators — $900,000 as a one-time special levy plus up to $100,000 from the contingency reserve fund (the CRF share needs no separate vote inside this resolution; any surplus goes back to the CRF). Spread across 48 residential lots (lots 2–49) by unit entitlement, the levy share works out to about $15,600–$16,400 for typical one-bedroom suites and up to about $28,200 for the largest units (table total $899,999.96 from rounding), payable in four equal instalments Jan 1 / May 1 / Aug 1 / Nov 1, 2027, without late penalty if paid on those dates.

This is a special levy under BC's Strata Property Act — a one-time charge, separate from monthly strata fees, for major work outside the annual budget (here paired with CRF funds). It requires a 3/4 vote of votes cast at the general meeting — abstentions don't count. Once passed, every owner owes their share — including anyone who voted against it or didn't attend. Note this comes months after a separate $100,000 special levy approved Feb 23, 2026 (convenience due date Aug 1, 2026).

None of this means the number is wrong. It might be exactly right. But a $1M project on 32-year-old elevators described as having ongoing issues — in a consultant's report most owners haven't seen — deserves a clear paper trail before 48 households sign off on it.
Note the sequence — and our position. The resolution authorizes up to $1M now, while the tender, the final scope, and the contractor choice — by the Executive, through confidential bidding — all come after. Owners are asked to approve the amount before the scope and contractor that set the actual cost are known. That is why we urge a NO vote until the report, bid count and scoring, and itemized scope are circulated — then vote your judgment on the facts.

Your rights as an owner

This is general information about BC strata law, not legal advice for your specific situation. For anything that could affect your vote or your unit specifically, a strata lawyer can confirm how it applies here.

Renting here? This vote still affects you

Only owners can vote — but most people living in this building are tenants, and an approved levy reaches tenants in three concrete ways. That is why we are asking tenants to forward this page to their landlord today.

What to do as a tenant: (1) send your landlord the link to this page today; (2) ask them to email Petra the six questions in Email template before September 21; (3) if you have a good relationship, ask whether they will name you as their proxy so their vote is cast by someone who lives with the outcome.

Hi — I live at [Unit ___], 140 E. 14th St (Springhill Place, LMS1203). Owners vote Sept 21 on a $1,000,000 elevator project ($900,000 levy, ~$15.6K–$28K per unit, plus $100K CRF). Only owners can vote, so I'm writing because this affects both of us: an approved levy can support a future RTB capital rent-increase application, and a surprise bill sometimes pushes owners to sell. Would you please read this summary before you vote or appoint a proxy? [ paste website URL here ] It has the six questions owners are asking the manager (engineering report, bid count/scoring and conflicts, itemized scope and mandatory-vs-discretionary split, phased-repair alternative, loan alternative, maintenance history), the per-lot amounts, and the meeting/proxy details (proxy deadline noon Sept 21; the managing agent can't hold it, but another owner, the Council President, or a tenant can). If you're open to it, I'd be willing to attend as your proxy — or please consider voting to postpone until the paperwork is circulated. Happy to discuss. Thank you, [Your name], Unit [___], [phone]

General information only, not legal or tenancy advice. Rent-increase rules: BC Gov “Additional rent increase for capital expenditures” and RTB forms RTB-52/53; tenancy rules: Residential Tenancy Act; strata voting: SPA ss.54–56, 147–148.

Realistic cost scenarios

Elevator "modernization" isn't one fixed thing — it's a menu of possible scopes, from a minor sensor swap to a full teardown. These are general 2026 North-American industry ballparks (parts + labour), not quotes for this building's equipment and not adjusted for this building's 14 stops, Vancouver labour rates, code-triggered add-ons, or the consultant / project-management / 10% contingency / 1% admin fees bundled into the $1M total:

Scope (per elevator)What it coversCAD range
Door protection, basicModern 2D infrared door sensor$3,000–$5,000
Door protection, full 3DCurrent-code infrared detection system$25,000–$35,000
Door operatorMotor, car-top controller, clutch$4,500–$11,000
Governor / safety devicesMandatory periodic test + parts if needed$2,500–$15,000
Wiring / traveling cablesRewire without touching the controller$6,000–$18,000
Motor / machine onlyRebuild or swap, keeping the controller$12,000–$30,000
Cab interior refreshWalls, flooring, lighting — cosmetic$11,000–$30,000
Hoistway doors, all landingsRefurbish tracks/rollers across 14 stops$20,000–$55,000
Controller onlyNew logic, selector, call stations$65,000–$95,000
Controller + wiringThe common "make it reliable" package$85,000–$130,000
Full modernizationComplete teardown and rebuild$200,000–$350,000+

Two full modernizations by these benchmarks land around $400,000–$700,000 total — below the $900,000 levy alone, and further below the $1,000,000 project total, before site-specific extras (14 stops, machine-room conditions, seismic/code work). The single fact that decides which row applies here is whether the current controller's make/model is still parts-supported. Ask in writing for the controller make/model, written parts-availability confirmation, and an itemized quote on these same line items so owners can see what is mandatory versus discretionary. Examples from the levy table: smallest shares ~$15,606 (669 entitlement, lots 9/14/19); typical one-beds ~$16,329 (700 entitlement); largest $28,248.92 (lot 48 / 1202, 1211 entitlement).

A better path: inspect first, then finance

Instead of approving $1M before the scope and contractor are known, we propose the meeting do this in two steps:

  1. Inspect first — three independent assessments. Hire at least three independent elevator consultants who do not sell parts, elevators, or installations (so their revenue doesn't depend on recommending replacement). Each reports in writing: (a) realistic yearly repair and maintenance cost going forward; (b) which replacement parts are genuinely necessary, with prices; (c) whether repair — not replacement — safely covers the next 5–10 years. Then owners vote the scope and the cost on facts, not estimates.
  2. If the approved cost exceeds $100,000, the strata borrows the full approved amount for 15 years instead of billing owners lump sums no one can absorb. The corporation borrows (SPA s.111, 3/4 vote) and repays through monthly fees — no owner takes a personal loan or passes a credit check. Example at 7% on a $500,000 approved cost:
BorrowedTermBuilding / monthTypical 1-bed / monthLargest unit / monthLifetime interest
$500,00015 years~$4,494~$82~$141~$309,000

Illustration only at 7% (smallest units ~$78/mo, larger 2-beds ~$108/mo; total repaid ~$809,000). The real rate, term, and fees come from the lender's term sheet — demand it before any borrowing vote. Compare: a $500,000 levy billed directly would demand roughly $9,000+ at once from a typical 1-bed versus ~$82/mo financed. If the inspection says honest repair costs far less, the loan shrinks with it — that is the point of step 1.

How to move this on September 21: vote NO on the undocumented $1M, then move to (a) postpone pending the three independent reports, or (b) amend toward the inspected scope with strata-loan financing. Wording matters — confirm motions with a strata lawyer and the chair before the meeting.

Email template

Copy this, add your name and unit number, and send it to the managing agent as soon as possible — the earlier you ask, the more time there is for a real answer before the vote.

To: petra@604realestate.ca Subject: Questions before the Sept 21 Special General Meeting — elevator levy (LMS1203) Hi Petra, Ahead of the September 21 Special General Meeting, I'd like to understand the proposed $1,000,000 elevator project ($900,000 special levy + up to $100,000 CRF) before I vote. Could you please provide, or confirm where owners can access, the following: 1. The engineering/condition report(s) the $1,000,000 estimate is based on — the Gunn Consulting report referenced in the rationale — including which components are being replaced and why. 2. How many contractor bids were obtained, who scored them, and whether any came from a firm with no ties to the current elevator maintenance provider or to Gunn Consulting (named as possible project manager). Will the scoring criteria and itemized bid be circulated? 3. An itemized breakdown of the quote (controller, machine, cab, doors, wiring, code-compliance items) so owners can see what's mandatory versus discretionary. 4. Whether a phased or targeted repair option was costed as an alternative to full modernization — and if not, whether the council would consider requesting one before the vote. 5. Whether financing the levy through a strata loan, repaid via fees over several years, was explored as an alternative to a lump-sum levy. 6. The maintenance and repair history of both elevators over the past 3–5 years, including costs. Could this information be circulated to all owners ahead of the meeting, rather than only in response to individual requests? I expect other owners would find it useful too. Thank you, [Your name], Unit [___]

Before September 21

  1. Send the email above to the managing agent now — don't wait for the meeting itself.
  2. Ask to see the actual resolution wording. It must state the purpose, total amount, the method for each lot's share, each lot's exact amount, and the payment date(s).
  3. Decide how you'll vote or who'll vote for you. If you can't attend, appoint a proxy in writing — the managing agent can't hold it, but another owner, "The Council President," or your tenant can. The proxy must attend in person.
  4. Compare notes with neighbours — owners and tenants. A levy this size affects everyone differently — some owners can absorb a $15–28K share easily, others can't, and tenants face possible rent and tenure effects. That's worth discussing before the vote, not after it passes.
  5. If the answers raise real concerns, you can propose an amendment at the meeting — a smaller scope, more competing bids, or loan financing instead of a lump sum.

Questions owners have asked

What if I live paycheque to paycheque and can't borrow $20,000 myself?

That is exactly the case for a strata loan: the corporation borrows the whole amount (e.g. $900,000 after the $100K CRF share) and repays through monthly fees — no owner takes a personal loan or passes a credit check. Illustratively, a financed $900K at 7% costs a typical 1-bed roughly $147–190/mo over 15–10 years instead of $4,082 every few months in 2027 (largest unit roughly $254–328/mo). The price is lifetime interest (hundreds of thousands building-wide) and lender covenants — and borrowing itself needs a 3/4 vote with the term sheet disclosed. Raise it as an amendment before the vote; after a lump-sum levy passes, an unpaid share risks a lien plus $50/month and 10% compound interest.

What happens if the 3/4 vote doesn't pass?

The levy doesn't proceed as written. Council can revise the scope or cost and bring a new resolution to a future meeting. For repairs tied specifically to safety, the strata can apply to the BC Supreme Court for approval if the vote gets a majority but falls short of 3/4 — but that's a narrow, court-supervised exception, not a routine fallback.

I'm planning to sell soon — does this affect me?

Yes — check the timing rule. The seller owes the portion payable before the conveyance date and the buyer owes the portion payable on or after it. With four 2027 instalments, a 2026 sale lands differently than a mid-2027 sale. Flag this to your realtor or lawyer and address it in the contract.

I'm a tenant — can my landlord just add $16,000 to my rent?

No — not directly. A strata levy is owner-paid. A landlord can only raise rent above the guideline by applying to the RTB for an Additional Rent Increase for Eligible Capital Expenditures, proving the work qualifies, and winning at a hearing where you can dispute it. Any approved amount is amortized (roughly ÷120 months) and capped. If you get an unusual increase notice, don't sign anything under pressure — pay under protest in writing and seek advice.

I'm a tenant on a longer lease — could I owe the levy myself?

Possibly. Tenants on a 3+ year lease to the same person take on owner powers and duties for the term (SPA s.148), including strata fees and levies due within the lease — and owners can also assign voting rights to tenants in writing (s.147). Check your lease length and ask your landlord, in writing, who pays and who votes.

I'm a tenant — what is the single most useful thing I can do?

Forward this page to your landlord today with one line: “Please read this before Sept 21.” Most landlords here don't live in the building — your message may be the only briefing they get. If you trust each other, offer to attend as their proxy.

Are you telling people to vote NO?

We urge a NO vote until the paperwork is circulated — the engineering report, the bid count and scoring, and the itemized scope showing what is mandatory versus discretionary. With those in hand, vote your judgment. A NO vote on an undocumented $1M simply sends it back for a documented proposal; it is not a claim against any person.

Is any of this saying the strata council did something wrong?

No. This page exists to help owners ask informed questions before a large, binding vote — not to accuse anyone of anything. The council may well have solid answers to all of the above. The point is that owners are entitled to see them before voting, not after.

Is this legal or financial advice?

No. This is general information based on publicly available sources about BC strata law and general elevator-industry cost data. For anything specific to your unit or your finances, a strata lawyer or financial advisor can give you an answer tailored to your situation.